• Insights

COVID-19 ‘shot-or-test’ emergency rule withdrawn in US

United States
02.02.22
2
Written by
FordHarrison LLP, nationwide U.S. law firm with a singular focus on HR law.
The US Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA) has withdrawn its rule requiring large employers to enforce a rule that employees must be vaccinated or have tested negative for COVID-19 for indoor work.

 

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) is withdrawing its COVID-19 vaccination or testing rule that previously applied to large employers. The withdrawal follows the US Supreme Court’s 13 January decision preventing OSHA from enforcing the rule. In that 6-3 decision, the Court reinstated an injunction previously lifted by the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Supreme Court held the rule’s challengers would likely prevail on the merits.

OSHA implemented the vaccination and testing requirement in an emergency temporary standard (ETS) on 5 November 2021. The ETS covered employers with 100 or more employees and included a mandate that they either require their employees to be fully vaccinated against COVID-19 or be tested weekly for the virus and wear face coverings when working indoors.

On 25 January, OSHA posted the notice of withdrawal on its website, a day ahead of its 26 January publication in the Federal Register. Also on 25 January, OSHA filed a motion with the Sixth Circuit asking the court to dismiss the pending legal challenges, stating its withdrawal of the ETS as a temporary standard renders the challenges moot. The motion states:

‘the Vaccination and Testing ETS’s requirements, which are currently stayed, will no longer be in effect, and petitioners will no longer be subject – or face any risk of being subject – to the challenged requirements from which they sought relief.’

While announcing the withdrawal of the ETS as a ‘binding rule,’ OSHA’s motion, its official notice of withdrawal, and its website all state the agency is not withdrawing the ETS as a ‘proposed rule.’ In the Sixth Circuit motion, OSHA stated that ‘it has left the proposed rule in place as part of a separate, ongoing rulemaking process that imposes no obligations and is not subject to challenge.’ This could potentially lead to OSHA issuing a final rule including a permanent standard narrower in scope than the now-defunct vaccination and testing ETS.

For example, OSHA’s website states the agency is now ‘prioritizing its resources to focus on finalizing a permanent COVID-19 Healthcare Standard.’ If successful, this would replace OSHA’s Healthcare Emergency Temporary Standard that, except for certain record-keeping provisions, expired on 27 December 27, 2021. The Supreme Court’s 13 January decision indicated OSHA could lawfully issue COVID-19 standards addressing ‘occupation-specific’ hazards.

Authors
Michael G. Prendergast
Partner - United States
FordHarrison LLP