-
Argentina
Bruchou & Funes de Rioja
Bruchou & Funes de Rioja
-
Australia
Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Corrs Chambers Westgarth
-
Austria
Schima Mayer Starlinger
Schima Mayer Starlinger
-
Bahrain
Al Tamimi & Co (Bahrain)
Al Tamimi & Co (Bahrain)
-
Belgium
Claeys & Engels
Claeys & Engels
-
Brazil
Veirano Advogados
Veirano Advogados
-
Bulgaria
BOYANOV & Co.
BOYANOV & Co.
-
Canada
Mathews Dinsdale
Mathews Dinsdale
-
Chile
Munita & Olavarría
Munita & Olavarría
-
China
Fangda Partners
Fangda Partners
-
Colombia
Brigard Urrutia
Brigard Urrutia
-
Croatia
Divjak Topić
Bahtijarević & Krka
Divjak Topić
Bahtijarević & Krka
-
Cyprus
George Z. Georgiou
& Associates LLC
George Z. Georgiou
& Associates LLC
-
Czech Republic
Randl Partners, advokátní kancelář, s.r.o.
Randl Partners, advokátní kancelář, s.r.o.
-
Denmark
Norrbom Vinding
Norrbom Vinding
-
Estonia
COBALT (Estonia)
COBALT (Estonia)
-
Finland
Dittmar & Indrenius
Dittmar & Indrenius
-
France
Capstan Avocats
Capstan Avocats
-
Germany
Kliemt.HR Lawyers
Kliemt.HR Lawyers
-
Greece
KREMALIS LAW FIRM
KREMALIS LAW FIRM
-
Hong Kong
Lewis Silkin (Hong Kong)
Lewis Silkin (Hong Kong)
-
Hungary
Bozsonyik-Fodor Legal
Bozsonyik-Fodor Legal
-
India
Kochhar & Co.
Kochhar & Co.
-
Ireland
Lewis Silkin (Ireland)
Lewis Silkin (Ireland)
-
Israel
Herzog Fox & Neeman
Herzog Fox & Neeman
-
Italy
Toffoletto De Luca Tamajo
Toffoletto De Luca Tamajo
-
Japan
Anderson Mori & Tomotsune
Anderson Mori & Tomotsune
-
Kazakhstan
AEQUITAS Law Firm
AEQUITAS Law Firm
-
Latvia
COBALT (Latvia)
COBALT (Latvia)
-
Lithuania
COBALT (Lithuania)
COBALT (Lithuania)
-
Luxembourg
CASTEGNARO
CASTEGNARO
-
Malta
Ganado Advocates
Ganado Advocates
-
Mexico
Basham, Ringe y Correa S.C.
Basham, Ringe y Correa S.C.
-
Netherlands
Blom Veugelers Zuiderman Advocaten
Blom Veugelers Zuiderman Advocaten
-
Netherlands
Bronsgeest Deur Advocaten
Bronsgeest Deur Advocaten
-
New Zealand
Kiely Thompson Caisley
Kiely Thompson Caisley
-
Norway
Advokatfirmaet Hjort DA
Advokatfirmaet Hjort DA
-
Peru
Vinatea y Toyama
Vinatea y Toyama
-
Poland
Raczkowski
Raczkowski
-
Portugal
pbbr
pbbr
-
Romania
Nestor Nestor Diculescu Kingston Petersen (NNDKP)
Nestor Nestor Diculescu Kingston Petersen (NNDKP)
-
Saudi Arabia
Al Tamimi & Co (Saudi Arabia)
Al Tamimi & Co (Saudi Arabia)
-
Serbia
Karanovic & Partners
Karanovic & Partners
-
Singapore
Rajah & Tann Singapore
Rajah & Tann Singapore
-
Slovakia
NITSCHNEIDER & PARTNERS
NITSCHNEIDER & PARTNERS
-
Slovenia
ŠELIH & PARTNERJI Law Firm
ŠELIH & PARTNERJI Law Firm
-
South Korea
Yulchon LLC
Yulchon LLC
-
Spain
Sagardoy Abogados
Sagardoy Abogados
-
Sweden
Elmzell Advokatbyrå
Elmzell Advokatbyrå
-
Switzerland
Blesi & Papa
Blesi & Papa
-
Thailand
Rajah & Tann Thailand
Rajah & Tann Thailand
-
Turkiye
Bener Law Office
Bener Law Office
-
Ukraine
Vasil Kisil & Partners
Vasil Kisil & Partners
-
United Arab Emirates
Al Tamimi & Co (UAE)
Al Tamimi & Co (UAE)
-
United Kingdom
Sackers
Sackers
-
United Kingdom
Lewis Silkin
Lewis Silkin
-
Venezuela
D'Empaire
D'Empaire
Insights
Background
The right to disconnect was first introduced into Belgian law in 2018. Since then, employers in the private sector have had an obligation to organise consultations ‘at regular intervals’ within their health and safety committee regarding the right to disconnect and the use of digital means of communication. Despite this measure, only a few employers in Belgium had an internal policy or set of rules regarding the right to disconnect. According to the 2022 edition of Claeys & Engels’s HR Beacon, this number was as low as 14%.
A ‘new’ right to disconnect
New legislation was passed in October 2022 to update and strengthen the right to disconnect. This law provides that all employers in the private sector with 20 employees or more are required to implement the right to disconnect for all categories of employees in a collective bargaining agreement (CBA) or through their work rules. However, this obligation lapses if a national or sectoral CBA has been concluded regarding the right to disconnect. Since then, a significant number of industries have concluded such a sectoral CBA.
The legal deadline for implementation was initially 1 January 2023, but this date was later moved to 1 April 2023 to give employers sufficient time to conclude a CBA or amend their work rules. The 2023 edition of the HR Beacon showed that at the end of 2022, almost 50% of companies had already implemented the right to disconnect. This number will likely have increased in the meantime as the implementation deadline has now passed.
What must be put in place?
The CBA or work rules regarding the right to disconnect must, as a legal minimum, contain provisions regarding:
Sanctions
Belgian law does not foresee specific sanctions for employers who have not (yet) implemented the right to disconnect. However, employers in Belgium also have general obligations related to well-being at work, and these also include the right to disconnect. If an employer fails to respect the right to disconnect, this could be seen as failure to comply with obligations regarding well-being at work. Breaches of these obligations may result in criminal or administrative sanctions for the employer and/or its representatives.
For more on employment law
The view from other places.